Proposed patch: cancel channel

Marco d'Itri md at
Thu Apr 13 22:08:25 UTC 2000

On Apr 13, Matus fantomas Uhlar <uhlar at> wrote:

 >hmmm can't we just open socket and send X cancel commands directly to innd,
 >by avoiding ctlinnd ? should I RTFS ?
I proposed that when the patch was submitted for the first time, but
somebody replied that a single command is processed per each select
loop. This means the ctlinnd socket is unsuitable for mass cancels.
( is a perl
implementation of the library used by ctlinnd to talk to the socket.)


More information about the inn-workers mailing list