Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS) compliancy?

[Marco d'Itri]

On Aug 11, Brandon Hume <hume at Den.BOFH.Halifax.NS.Ca> wrote:

 >That was my point!  Its nearly impossible to define what the "core" OS is
 >with Linux.
It's not: the core linux OS is made by the programs shipped with your
distribution of choice. If you have to install something by hand, it
goes in /opt and /usr/local. Everything else is part of the distribution
and should follow FHS.
There is no point asking INN follows FHS because this is a matter to
be handled by distributors, not by INN developers.
Actually, I think hand-installing INN in FHS locations is a violation
of FHS, and the original poster should research more the concept of
"locally installed software".

 >I haven't seen anyone yet claim to be a Red Hat administrator.
Aren't you lucky? :-)

-- 
ciao,
Marco