Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS) compliancy?

[Sven Paulus]

In article <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008161754100.15345-100000 at pcmy.sei.cmu.edu> James Ralston <qralston+ml.inn-workers at andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
|> I wouldn't want to deal with a whole bunch of quasi-FHS systems,
|> either.  That's why, when I build and deploy something, I either splat
|> it into its own directory hierarchy (/opt/blah, /var/blah, whatever),
|> or I follow the FHS to the letter.

I always thought that /opt/inn would be 100% conforming to the FHS (section
3.8). So, what's the problem with configuring INN to use this?
Of course, the suggested /etc/opt/inn is nonsense, /opt/inn/etc is much
clearer.