Problems with INN-2.2.3 and SuSE6.4

Katsuhiro Kondou kondou at
Fri Dec 22 07:59:58 UTC 2000

In article <Pine.GSO.4.21.0012211544140.680-100000 at>,
	Michael Stassen <stassenm at> wrote;

} I believe the checks should match the requirements, and we should handle
} years 100, 101, etc. as years 2000, 2001, etc.  I propose the following:

I agree with this basically.  But I'm still unsure about
large number of three digits like 300, 500 etc.  That
should be treated 2200, 2400 and so on? 
Katsuhiro Kondou

More information about the inn-workers mailing list