Problems with INN-2.2.3 and SuSE6.4

[Katsuhiro Kondou]

In article <Pine.GSO.4.21.0012211544140.680-100000 at jalapeno.ucs.indiana.edu>,
	Michael Stassen <stassenm at indiana.edu> wrote;

} I believe the checks should match the requirements, and we should handle
} years 100, 101, etc. as years 2000, 2001, etc.  I propose the following:

I agree with this basically.  But I'm still unsure about
large number of three digits like 300, 500 etc.  That
should be treated 2200, 2400 and so on? 
-- 
Katsuhiro Kondou