Problems with INN-2.2.3 and SuSE6.4

[Russ Allbery]

Katsuhiro Kondou <kondou at nec.co.jp> writes:
> Michael Stassen <stassenm at indiana.edu> wrote;

> } In the unlikely event that the current code is still in place in 2200, and
> } some articles still arrive with a year of 300 instead of 2200, then yes, I
> } think 300 should be treated as 2200.  

> Ok, I'll submit attached, if no one objects.

Looks fine to me.  Thanks!

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>