Problems with INN-2.2.3 and SuSE6.4
rra at stanford.edu
Mon Dec 25 05:51:28 UTC 2000
Katsuhiro Kondou <kondou at nec.co.jp> writes:
> Michael Stassen <stassenm at indiana.edu> wrote;
> } In the unlikely event that the current code is still in place in 2200, and
> } some articles still arrive with a year of 300 instead of 2200, then yes, I
> } think 300 should be treated as 2200.
> Ok, I'll submit attached, if no one objects.
Looks fine to me. Thanks!
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the inn-workers