groupbaseexpiry is expensive

[Katsuhiro Kondou]

In article <200001131236.GAA08123 at hank.cs.utexas.edu>,
	"Fletcher Mattox" <fletcher at cs.utexas.edu> wrote;

} If one uses groupbaseexpiry on even a modest tradspool directory,
} both expireover and expire call access(2) on every article in the
} spool directory (according to truss).  Is this really necessary?

That should be fixed and it's not so difficult.
I'll do after checking ovdb patches and some
of readers.conf extension.
-- 
Katsuhiro Kondou