Weirdness with storage tokens and absence of TAKETHIS

[Tom Kacvinsky]

To let everyone know, I found that if I recompiled inn-STABLE-20001027 with
CFLAGS="-g", the tokens get generated correctly.  Looks like a bug in gcc 2.95.2
for Linux on the PowerPC architecture (the default build uses -O2).

I have seen messages go through the teTeX list(s) about this kind of behaviour,
I *think* I may have seen a patch floating around for this (optimization bug).
I'll see what I can find...

Tom


On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:

> 
> Hi all,
> 
> > Oct 27 10:30:16 innfeed[6734]: news.ams.org article is missing \
> > <tjk-F439D4.10301827102000 at aragorn.ams.org> @03014F4E4500000000000000000000000000@
> > 
> 
> I figured out that this means that the storage manager on aragorn cannot find
> the article with token @03014F4E4500000000000000000000000000@, and so that is
> why I don't see a TAKETHIS.  It would be nice if the error message was more
> along the lines of
> 
>   innfeed[...]: CNFS-sm article <tjk-F439D4.10301827102000 at aragorn.ams.org> \
>   @03014F4E4500000000000000000000000000@ is missing; cannot feed to news.ams.org
> 
> Anyway, I am still stumped as to why all of the SM tokens are the same. :(
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
>