[2.3] lowmark

[Bettina Fink]

Katsuhiro Kondou <kondou at nec.co.jp> wrote:

> } The two cancelled articles on the 2.3 machine have "normal"
> } history entries:
> 
> Ok, I've just written a patch to purge overview data.  Try
> attached and tell me how it's going.

Thank you, I'll try this.

> } The problem with the mysterious returning "1584" is on a trad
> } spool 2.2.3 with "traditional" overview, not on a 2.3.x, see 
> } my last mail for details ... And I thought Russ and you are not
> 
> Oops, I should have read it more carefully.  ctlinnd renumber
> should work then.

You've missed the rest. ;-)

[...]

| 1584 is wrong, must be 1779. "ctlinnd renumber de.newusers.infos"
| corrects this. To prevent setting the lowmark wrong again, I've
| deleted "expire.lastlowmark" and did a "ctlinnd renumber" on
| the complete active. Did a "expireover -a". But after tonights
| news.daily:
| 
| news at wuff:~/log > grep de.newusers.infos expire.lastlowmark
| de.newusers.infos 1584
| 
| AIIIH! Where is this "1584" coming from?
| 
| news at wuff:~/spool/overview/de/newusers/infos > grep 1584 .overview
| news at wuff:~/spool/overview/de/newusers/infos >

Bye,
Bettina