pure transit server

[Fabien Tassin]

According to Russ Allbery:
> 
> > unfortunatly not for anything. I'm also interested to have IPv6 support
> > in CURRENT and why not in STABLE. There's already a quite improved patch
> > in all IPv6 distribs.
> 
> I assume this is the one that Marco posted earlier to inn-workers?

I don't remember which patch is was. What should be avoided is conditionnal
code. We need a proper dual stack, if possible.

> I intend to look at it, but I've been waiting until some of the other stuff
> that's pending is in (such as the history API).

Those two tasks are independants. 

-- 
Fabien Tassin -+- fta at sofaraway.org