Purify errors
Alex Kiernan
alexk at demon.net
Tue Feb 13 15:18:53 UTC 2001
Russ Allbery <rra at stanford.edu> writes:
> Katsuhiro Kondou <kondou at nec.co.jp> writes:
> > Alex Kiernan <alexk at demon.net> wrote;
>
> > } setvbuf [libc.so.1]
> > } ReopenLog [innd.c:260]
>
> > I'm not sure how this should be fixed.
>
> Yeah, that one sure looks like a libc bug to me.
>
I think they're bogus (they're marked as PLK - potential leaks);
looking at what Solaris is doing, it doesn't store the pointer
returned from malloc, but an offset from it; I suspect thats enough to
confuse purify.
BTW no more UMR/ABR following this mornings change, still trying to
figure out where the memory thats being leaked is from though :-(
--
Alex Kiernan, Principal Engineer, Development, Thus PLC
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list