Remaining memory leaks
Alex Kiernan
alexk at demon.net
Thu Jul 5 09:21:27 UTC 2001
Alex Kiernan <alexk at demon.net> writes:
> Alex Kiernan <alexk at demon.net> writes:
>
> > This is the last one I had left over from the last debugging session:
> >
> > New memory leaked: 331008 bytes (2.91%); potentially leaked: 0 bytes (0%)
> >
> > MLK: 331008 bytes leaked at 0x1890048
> > * This memory was allocated from:
> > malloc [rtlib.o]
> > realloc [rtlib.o]
> > x_realloc [xmalloc.c:108]
> > BUFFappend [chan.c:74]
> > NClist [nc.c:612]
> > NCproc [nc.c:844]
> >
> > I'm going to try removing the tests against "cp->{In,Out}.size >
> > BIG_BUFFER" at the tail end of CHANclose to see if thats how they're
> > getting leaked (since there's places other than the main channel table
> > which do "CHANclose(p); p = NULL;" kind of stuff).
> >
>
> Ignore this, I think it really is a phantom... I'm checking some more.
>
Definately a phantom... 16 hours of uptime, 0 leaked bytes!
--
Alex Kiernan, Principal Engineer, Development, Thus PLC
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list