PATH_GPGV in -current
rra at stanford.edu
Thu Jul 12 07:22:07 UTC 2001
Alex Kiernan <alexk at demon.net> writes:
> Is there a reason why PATH_GPGV is that rather than _PATH_GPGV
> (leading underscore), given how thats all the other paths into
> configure work? Or was it just a typo?
> Just got confused over it!
Yeah, all of the other ones should be changed to drop the underscore. :)
The comment in paths.h explains some of it. All those _PATH_* constants
violate the reserved namespace in the C standard, so they all need to
change to INN_PATH_* at some point, and the variables in the Makefiles and
therefore in configure.in should probably match, possibly modulo the INN_
part so that our configure macros can be reused by other people. So when
I put in gpgv, I used the naming scheme that I want to move us to in the
long run (that cleanup is currently slated for 2.5).
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the inn-workers