History cache performance?
Bernhard Kohl
B.Kohl at rrz.uni-koeln.de
Wed Mar 7 09:36:29 UTC 2001
Hello inn-workers,
[1] does anybody know "reasonable" values for history cache? I didn't
find anything in the FAQs. Does the following table point out to a
problem with the history files?
Reason Count %Count
------------- ------ ------
Positive hits 950874 37.8%
Negative hits 880000 35.0%
Do not exist 408311 16.2%
Cache misses 275792 11.0%
------------- ------ ------
TOTAL: 4 2514977 100.0%
[2] I found the file fixhist.pl and it sorted out many lines of the
type [68BAD6376C951E987C1968006F65CCF8] 982717690~-~982717690
The man page for history says:
Each line consists of two or three fields separated by a
tab, shown below as \t:
<Message-ID> \t date
<Message-ID> \t date \t files
[Hash] \t date
[Hash] \t date \t token
The Message-ID field is the value of the article's Message-
ID header, including the angle brackets. This appears if
articles are not stored by storage api and storemsgid in
inn.conf(5) is ``true''.
Therefore, I think this entry is a valid hash entry. But in the
history file there are both types of entries:
<45gl0n$n96 at guardian.EnGarde.com> 813454697~-~813422423 comp.bugs.4bsd/818
[68BAD6376C951E987C1968006F65CCF8] 982717690~-~982717690
So, I have 2 questions:
* 1 * Is it legal to have both types of entries in a single history
file? And if so
* 2 * Is there a version of fixhistory.pl that considers for
this?
Thanks in advance for any clues.
--
Thanks,
Bernhard Kohl mailto:B.Kohl at rrz.uni-koeln.de
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list