active.Z or active.all-alt.Z
yutaka at mailhost.net
Tue May 8 16:39:27 UTC 2001
Thanks for your comments, Russ.
Actuall I have read ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/CONFIG/README and
lerned that Mr. David Lawrence is maintaining the active
file. However, as I couldn't find out any explanation about the
difference between 'active' and 'altive.all-alt', I thought I could
come across any story about them.
I am still not clear wht those groupes are bogus and others are not,
but I think I got a feeling.
Yutaka KAWASE <yutaka at mailhost.net>
-- Original Message --
From: Russ Allbery <rra at stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: active.Z or active.all-alt.Z
Date: 08 May 2001 08:59:26 -0700
Message-ID: <ylzocnu90h.fsf at windlord.stanford.edu>
> Yutaka KAWASE <yutaka at mailhost.net> writes:
> > Hi all,
> > What is the difference between active.Z and active.all-alt.Z resides
> > in ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/CONFIG/ ?
> I'm not positive. We're probably not the best people to ask; you may want
> to mail tale directly. My understanding is that active.Z has more of the
> junk alt.* groups filtered out of it.
> Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the inn-workers