wiml at omnigroup.com
Mon Sep 10 21:57:15 UTC 2001
The Doctor <doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 05:10:33PM +0200, Przemyslaw Maciuszko wrote:
>> It does the tunneling from SSL layer.
>> It can be used to make SMTPS, POP3S, NNTPS and other.
> Not exactly a great solution. I just compile Sendmail 8.10 and
> Qpopper 4.0.3 with SSL addons, and that works better than any stunnel
> To me stunnel is a NON-solution.
What are the disadvantages of stunnel?
As far as I can tell, snews is just plain nntp carried over SSL/TLS;
there's no other modification to the protocol. Using a simple external
SSL implementation like stunnel seems architecturally cleaner than
building it into innd, nnrpd, etc.
More information about the inn-workers