IPv6 status

[Jeffrey M. Vinocur]

On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Russ Allbery wrote:

> Marco d'Itri <md at Linux.IT> writes:
>
> > Somebody needs to either take my old patch (which is 95% done), fix a
> > few bugs and merge it or write a new one from ground up.
>
> The last report was that Marco's patch worked fine on Linux, but broke on
> Solaris (breaking IPv4 as well as IPv6, or I would have said put it in the
> tree and then work on fixing it on other platforms).

I was going to let my local IPv6 guru have a look at it, but the patch
seems to call for lib/inet_stoa.c but that file is not actually included
in the patch...


Also, have Russ' concerns of

http://www.isc.org/ml-archives/inn-workers/2001/03/msg00145.html

been addressed?


-- 
Jeffrey M. Vinocur
jeff at litech.org