Problem with storage.conf

[Roberto Bertucci]

Thank you for your answer.
The article i posted was only in alt.binaries.multimedia and the cnfsstat 
output was saying "Newest":

Class IT  for groups matching "it.*"
  Buffer c45, len: 2000.00 Mbytes, used: 1901.26 Mbytes (95.1%)  21 cycles
   Newest: 2002-01-03 15:40:01,    0 days,  0:00:00 ago

Class TEST  for groups matching 
"alt.binaries.multimedia, at alt.binaries.mutimedia.erotica"
  Buffer c44, len: 2000.00 Mbytes, used: 1678.98 Mbytes (83.9%)  36 cycles
   Newest: 2002-01-03  9:55:39,    0 days,  5:44:22 ago

Class MEDIA  for groups matching "alt.binaries.multimedia.erotica"
  Buffer c42, len: 2000.00 Mbytes, used: 1407.39 Mbytes (70.4%) 457 cycles
   Newest: 2002-01-02 14:49:45,    1 days,  0:50:16 ago

Class SMALLAREA  for groups matching "*", article size min/max: 1/99999
  Buffer c38, len: 2000.00 Mbytes, used: 252.56 Mbytes (12.6%)   0 cycles
   Newest: 2001-06-29 12:18:09,  188 days,  4:21:52 ago
  Buffer c39, len: 2000.00 Mbytes, used: 252.62 Mbytes (12.6%)   0 cycles
   Newest: 2001-06-29 12:18:09,  188 days,  4:21:52 ago
  Buffer c40, len: 2000.00 Mbytes, used: 69.15 Mbytes ( 3.5%)   0 cycles
   Newest: 2001-06-29 12:18:09,  188 days,  4:21:52 ago
  Buffer c41, len: 2000.00 Mbytes, used: 56.84 Mbytes ( 2.8%)   0 cycles
   Newest: 2001-06-29 12:18:09,  188 days,  4:21:52 ago

Thank you,
Roberto


At 15.38 03/01/2002 +0100, Przemyslaw Maciuszko wrote:

>On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Roberto Bertucci wrote:
>
> > It seems that articles are stored in a random (more or less) group.
> > For example, i posted an article in alt.binaries.multimedia and i found it
> > in a cycbuff associated to IT group. Last update of SMALLAREA cycbuffs was
>Wasn't it crosspost?
> > done on 2001-06-29 12:18:09,  188 days,  3:46:57 ago, and i received a lot
> > of articles sized less than 100K.....
>Maybe it matched any of the previous classes?
>BTW: this output is from cnfsstat yes?
>Did You look correctly at "newest" not "oldest"?
>
>
>--
>Przemyslaw Maciuszko
>Agora S.A.