huge news system architecture
md at Linux.IT
Fri Mar 1 01:58:12 UTC 2002
On Feb 25, Katsuhiro Kondou <Katsuhiro_Kondou at isc.org> wrote:
>} >should be already gone. I've considered a storage method
>} >which utilizes remote server thru nntp, but I couldn't
>} >reach good way to expire overview data in reasonable time.
>} What's wrong with processing cancels?
>It should be fine if canceling message only by SMcancel.
>How does it know deleted messages manually or by system
It does not. People using this kind of setup must understand that some
things will not be possibile anymore. I think it's better to be limited
in doing borderline things like this than having to use diablo because
INN is not suitable at all for distributed use.
>And it's necessary to consider history/overview recreation
>from the remote spool thru nntp. I dont't think it could
>be done in reasonable time.
Why not? You just have to feed again the headers, this is what diablo
people do all the time.
More information about the inn-workers