cannot restart innd
William F. Maton
wmaton at ryouko.dgim.crc.ca
Sat Mar 23 19:34:53 UTC 2002
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Jeffrey M. Vinocur wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Katsuhiro Kondou wrote:
> > To my understanding, it doesn't matter whether
> > setsockopt(SO_REUSEADDR) is called before or
> > after bind(). Or, are there such OS like that?
> No idea. However, is it always safe to call it first? If so, why don't
> we change it and see if things improve?
> (Also, I see that not all of the uses of SO_REUSEADDR are wrapped inside
> the #ifdef to see if we have that option. Should they be?)
As far as I have seen, the sequence is socket() setsockopt() (if present)
and then bind().
More information about the inn-workers