history write time oddity
br+inn at panix.com
Fri May 17 22:17:49 UTC 2002
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 09:24:09AM +0900, Katsuhiro Kondou wrote:
> In article <20020503183030.GA18258 at panix.com>,
> Ben Rosengart <br+inn at panix.com> wrote;
> } INSTALL says that tagged-hash is desirable when RAM < (10 * tablesize),
> } but on this system, RAM (in bytes) is more like (40 * tablesize). Any
> } idea what could be causing this?
> Can you trace history part with truss?
Hmm, I don't see an option to ktrace to monitor just the history
files. I could trace only I/O, but innd does a lot of I/O, so it
would be hard to isolate the history stuff.
On NetBSD, truss (actually ktruss) is just a buggy front-end to
Ben Rosengart (212) 741-4400 x215
1. A robot may not injure entertainment industry profits, or, through inaction,
allow entertainment industry profits to come to harm. --Matt McLeod
More information about the inn-workers