CNFS offset problems

Russ Allbery rra at stanford.edu
Mon Feb 17 10:21:47 UTC 2003


Bettina Fink <laura at hydrophil.de> writes:

> After some quiet weeks, I'm again seeing problems on my testing
> machine:

> | Feb 16 17:20:05 nautilus innd: CNFS-sm: CNFSUsedBlock:
> | invalid offset 6400200, min = 8000, max = 6400000
> |
> | Feb 16 17:20:05 nautilus innfeed[27423]: CNFS-sm:
> | could not match article size token
> | @03004F4E45000000000000031FFF0000004B@ ONE:0x63ffe00:75: 1379

> The size of one buffer changed (all buffer used to have the same
> size = 102400 / 100 MBytes):

> -rw-r--r--    1 news     news     104857600 Feb 17 08:20 five
> -rw-r--r--    1 news     news     104857600 Feb 17 06:21 four
> -rw-r--r--    1 news     news     104858479 Feb 17 11:00 one  <==
> -rw-r--r--    1 news     news     104857600 Feb 17 04:40 three
> -rw-r--r--    1 news     news     104857600 Feb 17 01:00 two

> This is CURRENT-20030204 on Linux 2.2.23. No large file support.
> Buffers are in SEQUENTIAL mode.

> If something relating this bug was fixed since CURRENT-20030204,
> please drop me a note, then I'll just wipe and upgrade ...

There was another bug fix on 2003-02-12, but it should only have affected
cycbuffs over 2GB in size.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

    Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
     <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.


More information about the inn-workers mailing list