access: in readers.conf
Russ Allbery
rra at stanford.edu
Sun Jan 12 05:37:15 UTC 2003
Jeffrey M Vinocur <jeff at litech.org> writes:
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Well, the newnews one is already weird, since allownewnews is already
>> an inn.conf parameter and a readers.conf parameter in its own right,
>> but access overrides it.
> That's the problem -- it isn't a readers.conf parameter at all.
Isn't it? Oh, yeah, it isn't. Okay, that's weird.
> Heh, true. I guess defaulting to false would make sense for that one,
> especially since a default can be set at the top of readers.conf and
> inherit through.
Does that work currently? I know it will work with the new parser, but I
can't ever remember how well readers.conf inherits parameters at present.
--
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
<http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list