Expiry issue
Bettina Fink
laura at hydrophil.de
Sun Jan 26 10:44:57 UTC 2003
Russ Allbery <rra at stanford.edu> wrote:
>> The CURRENT-20030120 did the expiry as expected but not the
>> CURRENT-20030123.
>>
>> What changed?
>
> I did a whole bunch of cleanups aimed at making things easier to audit for
> security, and a lot of those changes were tricky. Could you give me more
> information on what failed? It's possible that I missed something.
I'm experiencing expiry problems too, with both CURRENT-20030122 and
CURRENT-20030125.
[...]
ctlinnd: Empty reason
Daily Usenet report from Jan 25 03:00:01 to Jan 26 03:00:01
[...]
ctlinnd: Cannot read input file
Expire messages:
expire begin Sun Jan 26 03:01:07 CET 2003: (-v1 -z/news/log/expire.rm)
expire: cannot reserve server
Article lines processed 0
Articles retained 0
Entries expired 0
Articles dropped 0
expire end Sun Jan 26 03:01:07 CET 2003
all done Sun Jan 26 03:01:07 CET 2003
expireover start Sun Jan 26 03:01:07 CET 2003
expireover end Sun Jan 26 03:12:51 CET 2003
lowmarkrenumber begin Sun Jan 26 03:12:51 CET 2003: (/news/log/expire.lowmark)
lowmarkrenumber end Sun Jan 26 03:12:52 CET 2003
The server itself seems to be running fine.
HTH,
Bettina
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list