Status of 2.4 release

[Katsuhiro Kondou]

In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212270329190.21868-100000 at puck.litech.org>,
	"Jeffrey M. Vinocur" <jeff at litech.org> wrote;

} Were those inserted just to make lint shut up, or because we actually
} don't care about the result?  (What I'm really asking is, does the person
} doing this need to keep an eye out for system calls with return values not
} being checked?)

I might have written this code, and this was intended
for just shutting up warnings.

} >  * Don't ever do them globally.  Instead, just fix code as we work on it.

This is what I've been doing.  But I don't have any
particular opinion on choosing options.

} that seems silly (especially since some files never get touched).  So I 
} think we're going to have to do it all at once (or at least by 
} subdirectory -- and by the way, whatever are we going to do with 
} innfeed?).

Ugh, I declared I'll do on last April.  But not done
yet.  That work would require some modification in
the code, and I'd prefer to leave the code for 2.4
to avoid enbug.
-- 
Katsuhiro Kondou