lock method used for buffindexed

[Ron Jarrell]

At 07:17 PM 1/11/2004, Russ Allbery wrote:
>Ron Jarrell <jarrell at solaris.cc.vt.edu> writes:
>
> > I've been having the same problem with binding too, I just hadn't 
> had a
> > chance to deal with it.  Happy to see this thread, so I know I'm 
> not the
> > only one!  Something's definitely broken in portability between 
> 2.4.0
> > and 2.4.1...
>
>I'm not sure what you're thinking of.  Nothing that we've been talking
>about is a difference between 2.4.0 and 2.4.1.

Well, the thread was talking about innbind failing in -current, which 
i'm also seeing.
But in addition, inndstart is failing in -stable, with the same 
symptoms, no permission,
despite being setuid root...

> > I had 2.4.0 running for some time on a somewhat reasonably patched
> > solaris 8.  I tried to build both a recent stable, and a recent 
> current
> > (well, recent when I grabbed then and built them initially 
> pre-xmas...),
> > and in both cases, innbind or inndstart (as appropriate) swore they
> > didn't have permission to bind to port 119, despite clearly being 
> setuid
> > to root, and with nothing else funky on the system.
>
>I have no idea on this.  I run my main INN servers on Solaris 8, and 
>I've
>never seen any sign of these problems.  I'm running 2.4.1 happily on 
>that
>platform now.

Can you send me your showrev -p?  Maybe there's some patch that's 
interfering..