lock method used for buffindexed is now changed

Russ Allbery rra at stanford.edu
Mon Jan 12 07:46:32 UTC 2004


Przemys=B3aw Maciuszko <sal at agora.pl> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 11:30:10PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:

>> Oh, yeah, I know.  I think they came in with the shared memory locking
>> patches.

> One more thing. After getting back to 20040107 I got following:

> Jan 12 08:31:02 inews nnrpd[454]: [ID 188097 news.error] buffindexed: ovg=
roupmmap ovbuff is null(ovindex is 13109, ovblock is 825569332

> So I'm restoring overview buffers from backup right now...

Yeah, I think changing the block size would have hosed your existing
buffers; those reinitialization messages would generally indicate that.

--=20
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

    Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
     <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.


More information about the inn-workers mailing list