SIGPIPE handling in nnrpd

[Russ Allbery]

Heath Kehoe <hakehoe at avalon.net> writes:

> The comment above the signal(SIGPIPE...) call says it's there to get out
> of long write loops.

> It appears that PushIOb doesn't check for error returns of xwrite.
> PushIOv does.  I'll also modify PushIOb to check for an error return and
> do an exit, the way that PushIOv does.  I'll look around for any other
> writes that aren't checked for error, and fix those, so that there's no
> need for the sigpipe handler.

Sounds great to me.

ExitWithStats and signal handling need to be completely reworked at some
point since it was designed in a simpler age with simpler worries, but
this is a good step to take until then.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

    Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
     <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.