tinyfeed miniature transit server

[Bill Davidsen]

Russ Allbery wrote:

> I agree with you that in general it would be better as a separate package,
> and libinn would probably be better as a separately distributed library
> that's also included with INN, but that really would require finishing
> stabilizing the API first.  I don't want to make *any* promises about the
> current contents of libinn; there are still vast swaths of it that I want
> to delete.

Let me disagree with myself (again). This really could go in contrib, as 
well as lots of other stuff to be written in the future against innlib. 
But it would probably be better off staying with INN for the forseeable 
future.

-- 
    -bill davidsen (davidsen at tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
  last possible moment - but no longer"  -me