Slow expireover (again)
mike-sender-6677e0 at zanker.org
Sun May 23 08:30:19 UTC 2004
On 23 May 2004 01:09 -0700 Russ Allbery <rra at stanford.edu> wrote:
> Did they go down in direct proportion to the number of articles on the
> system, or did they start going downhill later on after the article
> count had stabilized?
More or less in direct proportion to article lines processed:
824054 1h 50m
1026416 1h 47m
1239219 2h 10m
(added about 20,000 groups to active)
1430128 2h 33m
1634668 2h 55m
1884172 3h 42m
2228048 4h 16m
2525160 6h 57m
I have just found a news.daily from February when this box was using
timecaf but had approximately 20,000 groups in active. There were
2612176 article lines processed and expireover took only 22 minutes!
I have now changed from timehash to timecaf to see if the difference in
expireover behaviour affects the times.
More information about the inn-workers