Slow expireover (again)
Mike Zanker
mike-sender-6677e0 at zanker.org
Sun May 23 08:30:19 UTC 2004
On 23 May 2004 01:09 -0700 Russ Allbery <rra at stanford.edu> wrote:
> Did they go down in direct proportion to the number of articles on the
> system, or did they start going downhill later on after the article
> count had stabilized?
More or less in direct proportion to article lines processed:
Articles expireover
-------- ----------
273320 27m
824054 1h 50m
1026416 1h 47m
1239219 2h 10m
(added about 20,000 groups to active)
1430128 2h 33m
1634668 2h 55m
1884172 3h 42m
2228048 4h 16m
(machine rebooted)
2525160 6h 57m
I have just found a news.daily from February when this box was using
timecaf but had approximately 20,000 groups in active. There were
2612176 article lines processed and expireover took only 22 minutes!
I have now changed from timehash to timecaf to see if the difference in
expireover behaviour affects the times.
Mike.
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list