Slow expireover (again)

Mike Zanker mike-sender-6677e0 at
Mon May 24 09:37:12 UTC 2004

On 24 May 2004 02:25 -0700 Russ Allbery <rra at> wrote:

> Depends on the article.  If the article is in timecaf, it checks
> timecaf directly; if it's in timehash, it checks history.
> Okay, we've identified the source of your problems, then; the
> querying of the history database from inside expireover is too slow.
> Since it's directly related to the number of articles in the spool,
> I'm betting it's directly related to the size of your history file,
> which means that I think I'm right about the memory thrashing.

Yes, I was planning to double it to 512MB this week to see what effect 
it has.



More information about the inn-workers mailing list