Snapshots for CURRENT

Russ Allbery rra at
Thu Aug 9 18:00:09 UTC 2007

Julien ÉLIE <julien at> writes:

> Isn't there any more verbose log than innd/chan failing?  Don't you know
> which test in innd/chan is failing?

It's test 12, and no, we're not getting anything more verbose.  And I
can't make the test fail when I run it by hand, even by going to the
directory where the snapshot runs and immediately re-running the test.
It's very odd.

I think there's some sort of uninitialized memory problem, and I do see
something along those lines in valgrind output, but I haven't been able to
track down what's causing it.

ok 11
==27162== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==27162==    at 0x4025345: strcmp (mc_replace_strmem.c:341)
==27162==    by 0x8053B8E: ok_string (libtest.c:73)
==27162==    by 0x805388B: reader (chan-t.c:102)
==27162==    by 0x805D859: CHANreadloop (chan.c:1021)
==27162==    by 0x805362E: main (chan-t.c:68)
ok 12

Russ Allbery (rra at             <>

    Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
     <> explains why.

More information about the inn-workers mailing list