Questions about Perl and doc
Russ Allbery
rra at stanford.edu
Wed Sep 5 17:36:01 UTC 2007
Julien ÉLIE <julien at trigofacile.com> writes:
> I have three little questions which puzzle me:
> * why are there in mod-active the following two consecutive lines?
> $oldact = $inn::active; # active file location
> $oldact = $inn::active; # active file location (same; shut up, perl -w)
> I do not understand why -- perhaps an issue with antediluvian Perl
> versions?!?
When you run perl with -w, it warns about variables used only once. This
would go away if we replaced innshellvars.pl with a real Perl module that
declares and exports its variables properly, something I was hoping to do
eventually.
> * what are in some Perl scripts lines like these ones for?
> # lint food
> print $inn::pathrun.$inn::pathlog.$inn::pathetc.$inn::newsbin;
Same problem.
> * why are hook-perl and hook-python only available in text format in
> doc/? wouldn't it be useful to also [or only?] have them in man format
> in doc/man? Indeed, there is no "man filter_innd" or "man filter_nnrpd"
> for quick reference...
Yeah, that's probably not a bad idea. I just wasn't thinking about that
when I wrote it.
Likewise, it probably wouldn't be a bad idea to install the INSTALL
document as an inn man page in some section.
> And by the way, is it OK if I add symbolinc links (like actsyncd(8) ->
> actsync(8)) for nocem.ctl(5) -> perl-nocem(8) and localgroups(5) ->
> docheckgroups(8)?
Yes, please do. That's a great idea.
--
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
<http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list