INN and db 4,6

[Russ Allbery]

Marc Stürmer <mail at marc-stuermer.de> writes:
> Am Dienstag 25 September 2007 schrieben Sie:

>> You can do anything you want with a small server; any of those options
>> would be fine.  But for a small server, why not just use tradindexed
>> and get much better recovery properties?

> I for myself am running a not so small server and I am very, very
> _satisfied_ with tradindexed. Ran buffindexed and OVDB before, both were
> not made for me.

> I know at least someone who's got an at least as big server as me and
> who is also heavy considering to move back to tradindexed, too.

Yeah, I wrote it because it's what I wanted.

I can readily believe that some people won't like the performance,
particularly since it's quite conservative about flushing pages to disk.
But I tried to make it extremely robust, since that's what I was the most
worried about.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

    Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
     <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.