HDR and OVER
rra at stanford.edu
Sat Aug 23 17:24:15 UTC 2008
Julien ÉLIE <julien at trigofacile.com> writes:
> I see that HDR and OVER are (exactly?) our current XHDR and XOVER commands.
> (OVER would then be without the capability OVER MSGID.)
I'm fairly sure that we don't implement the protocol exactly as specified,
although I don't remember now what the problem was. There was some reason
why we weren't providing HDR and OVER, though. Note the comment:
** XHDR and XPAT extensions. Note that HDR as specified in the new NNTP
** draft works differently than XHDR has historically, so don't just use this
** function to implement it without reviewing the differences.
It needs a careful review, particularly in edge cases and error codes,
before we advertise it as HDR or OVER.
> Have the four commands XHDR, XOVER, HDR and OVER?
That's the right approach in the long run, with the appropriate responses
> If yes, should the four commands appear in HELP? What for CAPABILITIES?
> (Should it return XHDR and XOVER?)
CAPABILITIES should only list documented extensions. XHDR and XOVER
aren't documented extensions, just legacy commands. But yes, they should
all be listed in help.
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
<http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.
More information about the inn-workers