signcontrol configuration

[Russ Allbery]

Julien ÉLIE <julien at trigofacile.com> writes:

> Regarding control/signcontrol, I think there is a little problem
> with the make behaviour.  Indeed, this file removes the previous one
> during a "make update", which is not very good since it erases the
> configuration made by the user.  I believe the right thing to do is
> to put the configuration section in a config file which should not
> be modified by "make update".
> Otherwise, it is not very clean...

I'm not sure this file should even be included in INN.  Most INN
installations will never issue signed control messages, and those who want
to do this can easily download it from the pgpverify distribution (or one
of the many other programs that do this).

Ticket #14.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

    Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
     <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.