Injection-Date and Injection-Info in nnrpd

Julien ÉLIE julien at trigofacile.com
Sat Dec 19 14:08:09 UTC 2009


Hi Heiko,

>>   [IHAVE] differs from the POST command in that it is intended
>>   for use in transferring already-posted articles between hosts.
>>
>> It SHOULD NOT be used when the client is a personal news-reading program,
>
> Then IHAVE is not necessary in nnrpd at all.
>
> I don't see any reason why endusers should be handled different if they use
> POST and IHAVE.

I am still unsure about what should be done.
I was about to remove the special case of IHAVE in nnrpd so that it were
handled like POST.  But what for the "I" rights we could give to users
via readers.conf?

If IHAVE had been intended to be used like POST, wouldn't have it been added
to "P"?

If the news administrator does not currently add "I", nobody will be able
to use IHAVE.  So maybe "I" is specifically to allow some users to *inject*
news the way innd does?  Are we sure IHAVE is not currently used in nnrpd
with that behaviour?

-- 
Julien ÉLIE

« Pourquoi les programmeurs confondent-ils Halloween et Noël ?
  Parce que OCT 31 == DEC 25. » 




More information about the inn-workers mailing list