require_ssl with SASL secure layers

[Grant Taylor]

On 05/31/09 19:09, Jeffrey M. Vinocur wrote:
> Sounds lovely.



> (The thought crossed my mind of trying to add a little more 
> expressive power to it, by changing from boolean to a list, where the 
> user could specify exactly what would be adequate encryption for a 
> given block to be tried, e.g. "require_encryption: TLS, 
> SASL.CRAM-MD5, SASL.DIGEST-MD5" but then I thought that might be 
> trouble than it's worth.)

Just my $0.02 worth here:

Sendmail lists out all the auth mechanisms in order of preference, so I 
don't think doing something like this is out of the ordinary.



Grant. . . .