require_ssl with SASL secure layers
gtaylor at riverviewtech.net
Mon Jun 1 18:52:46 UTC 2009
On 05/31/09 19:09, Jeffrey M. Vinocur wrote:
> Sounds lovely.
> (The thought crossed my mind of trying to add a little more
> expressive power to it, by changing from boolean to a list, where the
> user could specify exactly what would be adequate encryption for a
> given block to be tried, e.g. "require_encryption: TLS,
> SASL.CRAM-MD5, SASL.DIGEST-MD5" but then I thought that might be
> trouble than it's worth.)
Just my $0.02 worth here:
Sendmail lists out all the auth mechanisms in order of preference, so I
don't think doing something like this is out of the ordinary.
Grant. . . .
More information about the inn-workers