On 03/18/09 14:19, Ray Banana wrote: > Of course it does. 10.0.0.0/8 is the equivalent of 10.*, > 192.168.0.0/16 is identical to 192.168.* and so on. This may be (and very likely is) the case, but this is not C(lassless)IDR, which is what I was wanting to use. Grant. . . .