Call for INN 2.5.2 testing (new NNTP RFC 3977)

Ray Banana rayban at banana.shacknet.nu
Wed Nov 18 05:20:07 UTC 2009


Julien ÉLIE wrote:

>> I will put it on a stand-by server that receives a full text feed,
>> albeit just from one peer (my production feeder)
>> This should produce realistic results for the message-ID tests.
> 
> Thanks!
> We'll see whether it receives everything that your production feeder
> receives and accepts.

So these are the results from the first 24 hours for a full text feed of
100263 articles:

bad_messageid <C727662E.4BAA3%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>
bad_messageid <C7273943.4BA8F%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>
bad_messageid <4b01e330 at news.>
bad_messageid <slrn20091109075439.943.twooffive at may.eternal-september.org>
bad_messageid <C727662E.4BAA3%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>
bad_messageid <C727662E.4BAA3%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>
bad_messageid <C7273943.4BA8F%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>
bad messageid <C727662E.4BAA3%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>
bad_messageid <C727662E.4BAA3%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>
bad_messageid <C727662E.4BAA3%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>
bad_messageid <4b0251d9$1 at news.>
bad_messageid <C7234D73.4B7E4%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>
bad_messageid <C7246E22.4B855%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>
bad_messageid <C724B402.4B872%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>
bad_messageid <C724B48E.4B873%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>
bad_messageid <C724C00A.4B884%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>
bad_messageid <C724DE13.4B88C%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>
bad_messageid <C724DEE1.4B88E%nicknaym@[remove_this].gmail.com>



More information about the inn-workers mailing list