64bit time_t patch
eagle at eyrie.org
Wed Dec 11 21:12:32 UTC 2013
"S.P.Zeidler" <spz at serpens.de> writes:
> I haven't had time to inspect this thoroughly, but have the impression
> that changing from "cast time_t to long" to a 2039 compatible version,
> doing printf(" .. %jd ..", (intmax_t) timeval); would be too disruptive
> for a minor version. Maybe for the next major?
This will definitely break compatibility with a variety of older systems,
as those printf flags are relatively new. I'm not sure if we care any
Russ Allbery (eagle at eyrie.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
<http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.
More information about the inn-workers