nnrp conf

Edwardo Garcia wdgarc88 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 19 11:59:35 UTC 2015


Halo,

On 3/18/15, Julien ÉLIE <julien at trigofacile.com> wrote:
> Hi Edwardo,
>
>> I think as other say, be better for very clear example in add user:
>> <EXAMPLE>
>>
>> This is still confuse, this what leed to my server be open to
>> everyone, someway, it did not work this procedure because I try follow
>> that at first.
>
> OK, I see where the confusion came.  I then suggest the following new
> wording.  Would it suit both you and Noel?
>
>
>      auth example.com {
>          hosts: "*.example.com, example.com"
>          default: "<EXAMPLE>"
>      }
>
>      access full {
>          users: "<EXAMPLE>"
>          newsgroups: *
>      }
>
> Note that the above access realm could also be written without the
> users: key, in which case it applies to any user identity (though in
> this example, the user identity that will be assigned to all matching
> connections is C<< <EXAMPLE> >>).  It is however recommended to keep
> an explicit users: key so as to better view to whom the access block
> applies.
>
> As the only available auth realm only matches hosts in the "example.com"
> domain, any connections from other hosts will be rejected immediately.
>
> --
> Julien ÉLIE
>
> « – Maintenant les Romains sont alertés.
>    – En tout cas, ceux-là ne sont plus très alertes ! » (Astérix)
>
This is good descriptor, yes, please make.


More information about the inn-workers mailing list