nnrp conf

Edwardo Garcia wdgarc88 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 19 12:00:17 UTC 2015


Halo,

On 3/18/15, Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote:
>
>
> sounds peachy :)

What is peachy?


>
> On 18/03/2015 07:23, Julien ÉLIE wrote:
>
>> Hi Edwardo,
>>
>>> I think as other say, be better for very clear example in add user:
>>> <EXAMPLE> This is still confuse, this what leed to my server be open to
>>> everyone, someway, it did not work this procedure because I try follow
>>> that at first.
>>
>> OK, I see where the confusion came. I then suggest the following new
>> wording. Would it suit both you and Noel?
>>
>> auth example.com {
>> hosts: "*.example.com, example.com"
>> default: "<EXAMPLE>"
>> }
>>
>> access full {
>> users: "<EXAMPLE>"
>> newsgroups: *
>> }
>>
>> Note that the above access realm could also be written without the
>> users: key, in which case it applies to any user identity (though in
>> this example, the user identity that will be assigned to all matching
>> connections is C<< <EXAMPLE> >>). It is however recommended to keep
>> an explicit users: key so as to better view to whom the access block
>> applies.
>>
>> As the only available auth realm only matches hosts in the "example.com"
>> domain, any connections from other hosts will be rejected immediately.
>
>


More information about the inn-workers mailing list