Pending patches for INN?

[Julien ÉLIE]

Hi Richard,

> I would suggest NOT delaying any release for my benefit - I devote time
> to this in very unpredictable ways.

OK, noted.  Thanks again for your investment in improving
the robustness of INN.

Regarding your first patch for innxmit, shouldn't
  static char *buff;
be changed to
  static char *buff = NULL;
as you no longer use xmalloc, but only xrealloc?

If *buff is not initialized to NULL, it seems that it could
trigger an issue off with xrealloc trying to expand memory
from a wrong location.




As for actsync.c, maybe we could add the following test at the beginning
of get_active()?

@@ -742,7 +742,9 @@
     if (len == NULL)
         die("internal error #1: len is NULL");
     if (errs == NULL)
-        die("internal error #2: errs in NULL");
+        die("internal error #2: errs is NULL");
+    if (host == NULL)
+        die("internal error #10: host is NULL");
     if (D_BUG)
         warn("STATUS: obtaining active file from %s", host);
 

-- 
Julien ÉLIE

« Oublie les injures, n'oublie jamais les bienfaits. »