best storage type

[Julien ÉLIE]

Hi Nick,

> bump?

I see that Kamil's answer did not reach the mailing-list.  Below, after 
my two remarks, follows the answer he gave.

> So, what is the best storage method? Our aim is to never expire
> messages, but the tradspool looks so inefficient, what are people
> using? We have over 100GB spool, we need to rebuild the server so
> want to get it right , it will be anew server we will be doing a mass
> pull feed from old-server to new, so not looking to convert or
> anything.

* Why do you say "tradspool looks so inefficient"?  Are you facing 
performance issues?  Is it because of inodes consumption?

* Like Kamil, I would also recommend timecaf or CNFS for your needs.  In 
case you choose CNFS, make sure (and regularly check with cnfsstat for 
instance) you have enough buffers so that they do not wrap.

-- 
Julien




Sujet :  Re: best storage type
De :  kjonca (-at-) o2.pl (Kamil Jońca)
Date :  28/03/2016 12:14

I think you have choice between timecaf and cnfs (with manually watching
if it is not full)

Maybe read only imap server would be better?
KJ

-- 
http://stopstopnop.pl/stop_stopnop.pl_o_nas.html
Just go with the flow control, roll with the crunches, and, when you get
a prompt, type like hell.