Parametring cancel processing (Cancel-Lock vs unauthenticated cancels)

[Grant Taylor]

On 1/2/22 2:41 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I think it shouldn't be a no-op; it should either work to override 
> the config setting or we should remove it so that it will cause an 
> error and people will have to update their configuration.  Otherwise, 
> I think we risk silent and surprising behavior change.

I too am against the no-op.

I'd much rather see it be a warning for one (or more) versions and 
eventually be tantamount to a syntax error to fail hard / fast.



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4017 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/inn-workers/attachments/20220102/402d674b/attachment-0001.bin>