On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 12:13:30AM +0200, S.P.Zeidler wrote:
> You encrypt articles that everybody and their dog can read on
> google? great win.

No, I encrypt articles in my private news network that I use in
favor of an "Intranet" website at my big, big company.

Okay, I don't really, but I could, and that's why nntps isn't such a
bad idea.

(I definitely could use something like this for a private nntp
network that's a slight misuse of nntp, in that it doesn't have
humans at the ends, but is an entirely automated process, actually.
Right now I'm gpg-encrypting every message. Which is kind of a
drag, and arguably unecessary overhead.)

-- 
       ~ g r @ eclipsed.net

-- Attached file included as plaintext by Listar --

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7oHs/9ehacAz5CRoRAqrcAKC1I4pog+LQ3XmshtF/4kip04TsKgCfaHHJ
0OajVE1Zy1CG4OqlnhYiELY=
=T2gM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----