install /usr/include/paths.h, which conflicts with a file by the same
name installed by glibc.
	After installing inn, attempts to build many programs that
expect glibc's symbols in /usr/include/paths.h fail to compile,
including WorkBone, apmd, autofs, dosfstools, e2fsprogs, fileutils,
finger, fuse, gdm, gnome-vfs, inetutils, kdebase, kdemultimedia,
libgtop, libsdl, libzvt, libzvt2, lynx, magicdev, ncpfs, ntalk, ppp,
procps, routed, rpm, rusers, rwall, rwho, sessreg, sh-utils,
sliplogin, sysklogd, tcsh, vacation, vte, xine-lib, and zsh.

	At least in the case of inn-2.4.3, attempting to work around
the problem with "./configure --includedir=/usr/include/inn" results
in command syntax errors when "make install" is run, although I
suspect that this misbehavior might be related to the newly released
version of GNU sed, which I think may be stricter about regular
expression substitution than previous versions.

	This problem is acknowledged in the TODO file in the top level
of the inn distributions, and in a 2003 message on the inn-workers
mailing list at the following URL:

http://marc.10east.com/?l=inn-workers&m=105639025312796&w=2

	Given that this trivial problem has been around for years and
breaks the build of so many other program, I suggest that the following
patch or some refinement thereof be integrated promptly rather than
waiting for who knows how many more years for inn-2.5.

	This patch to inn-CURRENT moves include/paths.h to
include/inn/paths.h to avoid conflicts with glibc.  The changes were
made by manually editing the TODO file, and then running the following
shell commands from the top of the inn source tree:

mv include/paths.h.in include/inn/ 
for file in $(find . -type f | xargs grep -l paths.h) ; do
	ed $file << DONE
1,\$s|paths.h|inn/paths.h|g
w
q
DONE
done

	Because I do not run a news server at the moment, I have only
verified that inn with a default configuration on still compiles with
the patch applied, and with the glibc version of /usr/include/paths.h
installed, on x86 + linux-2.6.18 + glibc-2.5.  On the other hand, it's
an include file whose contents are not modified by the patch, so I
imagine you should be able to look it over, and check it in with few
modifications to the development branch at least.

	I will also post a version of this patch against
inn-STABLE-20061118 in a separate message to make it easier to
extract the patches separately.

Adam Richter