<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN">
<html><body style='font-size: 10pt'>
<p>sounds peachy :)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On 18/03/2015 07:23, Julien ÉLIE wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
<pre>Hi Edwardo,</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px">I think as other say, be better for very clear example in add user: <EXAMPLE> This is still confuse, this what leed to my server be open to everyone, someway, it did not work this procedure because I try follow that at first.</blockquote>
<pre>OK, I see where the confusion came. I then suggest the following new wording. Would it suit both you and Noel?
auth example.com {
hosts: "*.example.com, example.com"
default: "<EXAMPLE>"
}
access full {
users: "<EXAMPLE>"
newsgroups: *
}
Note that the above access realm could also be written without the
users: key, in which case it applies to any user identity (though in
this example, the user identity that will be assigned to all matching
connections is C<< <EXAMPLE> >>). It is however recommended to keep
an explicit users: key so as to better view to whom the access block
applies.
As the only available auth realm only matches hosts in the "example.com"
domain, any connections from other hosts will be rejected immediately.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>