ref unwanted email.

[Olaf Zaplinski]

Jon Lawrence wrote:
> 4 x the usual rate. I just received about 20 spam's. Normally I get about half 
> a dozen per month - I'm pretty sure the lists are currently set to bypass my 
> own filters.

Hmm... after I sent my last message to you, I got two other ones. Header of 
one was:

Received: by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix, from userid 8)
	id BAA5E6BF71; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:58:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 193.0.0.201 (unknown [61.53.14.33])
	by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 810EE6BF7A; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:58:28 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: irrtoolset at ripe.net
Delivered-To: irrtoolset at ripe.net
Received: from bibi.com.br (mailhost.bibi.com.br [216.33.88.3])
                  by fep5.berntsen-foundry.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B17D87
                  for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:01:18 -0500
Message-ID: <20041121GO45adhjhZYTT56u at bibi.com.br>
From: "Wilburn Sanchez" <52demolish at mail.accessorl.net>
To: irrtoolset at ripe.net
Subject: thorium
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:01:18 -0500


So irrtoolset at ripe.net seems to be open for spam. Just in case, I 
unsubscribed from everything.

> If I want to keep up with what's 
> happening in the RIPE region and possibly even take part in the future 
> directions things go, then need to be on the mailing lists EOS.

Yes, that is true. But receiving two or more spam messages every hour is too 
much.

> OK, lots of spam would be a major pita but in the main the RIPE lists are some 
> of the most spam free ML's I'm on.

Up to today, I would have said the same.

> I 
> just could'nt think of a better place to post the first message (should've 
> gone to antispan-wg I suppose)

I CC'ed the anti-spam-wg now, but I had to guess its address. www.ripe.net 
does not make this list's address publicy visible, apparently an anti spam 
measure.

Olaf