[kea-dev] Call for comments about the Decline design

[Tomek Mrugalski]

On 11.08.2015 19:31, Thomas Markwalder wrote:
> On 8/11/15 12:39 PM, Tomek Mrugalski wrote:
>> To wrap this up, would the following change address your concerns?
>>
>> - Remove special purpose hwaddr/duid
>> - Use state=declined only
>>
>> The benefits of that approach are:
>> - no data redundancy (single condition for declined: state==declined)
>> - database reflects reality
>> - much less code to update
>>
>> Tomek
> Yes.  Again my primary issue was the special use of hwaddr/duid
> attributes. 
Decline design updated. Special duids and hwaddr are gone. Unless you
(or other folks) raise other issues, I consider this design done.

Tomek